History Compass is an online journal that publishes historiographic essays. If there is an essay on your topic, it can be an excellent place to start. Caution: if you do not find what you need with your first search, you will need to scroll to the bottom of the search results page and click on Modify Search to start a new search within History Compass.
Otherwise, you will need to specify that you want to search only this journal and not the entire list of Blackwell online journals. For example, in AHL, to find historiography on the American Civil war, do a Subject search for: civil war historiography. Annual bulletin of historical literature History Reference SH.
H65 and online. Note: to find copies of the Blackwell Companions, do a keyword search in the Main Catalog for " Blackwell companions to history," "Blackwell companions to American history," " Blackwell companions to British history," " Blackwell companions to world history," or " Blackwell companions to European history " to see if there is a volume in this series that covers your topic.
Except when two historians using different sources come up with contradictory answers to the same question. Even worse, what if two historians ask the same question and use the same sources but come up with different answers? This happens pretty regularly and can lead to heated debates, complete with name-calling. To avoid unnecessary disagreements and survive legitimate debates, good historians explain why their question is important, exactly what sources they found, and how they analyzed those sources to reach a particular interpretation.
In other words, they prove that both their approach and answers are valid and significant. This is why historical texts have so many footnotes.
To sum up: most UNC history instructors will expect you to both know information and interpret it to answer a question about the past. Your hard-won ability to name all the governors of Idaho in chronological order will mean little unless you can show why and how that chronology is significant. For general tips, see our handout on understanding assignments. A typical Carolina history course includes several kinds of writing assignments:.
To begin a historiographical essay, you will first read multiple works on the same topic, such as the American Revolution. You can organize your essay chronologically in the order that the books on the topic were published or methodologically grouping historians with similar interpretations together. Some questions to consider as you write a historiographical essay are: How has the historiography on this subject evolved over time?
What are the different schools of thought on the topic, and how do they impact the interpretations of this subject?
Why have different scholars come to different conclusions about this topic? You may find some of the information in our handout on literature reviews helpful.
http://edutoursport.com/libraries/2020-10-11/1906.php The specifics of your particular assignment will obviously vary. Recall the link between history and writing In case you missed this, history is basically an educated guess about the past. When you write, you will most likely have to show that you know something about the past and can craft that knowledge into a thoughtful interpretation answering a specific question. You will have to read before you write. If the reading has been assigned, guess why your instructor chose it.
The extreme wealth and power of the Medici family extended even further into the art of the Renaissance period and their depiction was prevalent as saintly figures in the works of these artists. MJ Millie Jenkerinx Nov 11, Loyalist historians focus on the mass exodus of the loyalists before and during the American Revolution. Take thorough notes. For the development of a clear as well as well-structured go, you need to carry out some essential steps. A Anonymous May 21,
Whatever you read, ask yourself:. For more on this, see also our handout on reading to write. Since you now having completed step 1 anticipate having to make—and support—an educated guess, pick the question apart. Opportunities to show what you know. These are requests for information and are usually pretty easy to find. Look for verbs like these:. Opportunities to show what you think. These are requests for interpretation. Look for key words like these:. These introductory statements, however, can offer clues about the expected content and organization of your essay.
A strong answer would not only pick a culture and prove its importance to the development of breadmaking, but also:. For more on this, see our handout on understanding assignments. Jot down what you know and what you think This is important because it helps you develop an argument about the question. You should be able to trace each item in this list to a specific source lecture, the textbook, a primary source reading, etc.
What conclusions might a reasonable person draw? If this is more difficult which it should be , try:. In our example, there is no need to prove that Western civilization would have died out without bread.
If no question has been assigned, give yourself plenty of time to work on step 4. Now, do any of these ideas seem significant? Do they tie in to some theme of your reading or course? For more on this, see our handout on making an argument , handout on constructing thesis statements , and handout on asking for feedback on your writing. The next step is to figure out a logical way to explain and prove your argument. Remember that the best thesis statements both take a position and give readers a map to guide them through the paper.
Look at the parts of your thesis and devote a section of your essay to each part. Fill in each section—also called a paragraph—using your lists from step 5. For more help with this, see our handout on introductions , handout on conclusions , handout on transitions , and handout on paragraph development. Do the parts of your paper make sense—and prove your point—in this order?
Check content First, read your draft and ask yourself how each section relates to your thesis or overall argument. Have you explained this relationship? If not, would it be easier to rework the body of your paper to fit your argument or to revise your thesis to fit the existing content?